Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 1164220210330010109
Journal of Korean Society for Radiotherapeutic Technology
2021 Volume.33 No. 1 p.109 ~ p.116
Evaluation of the usefulness of IGRT(Image Guided Radiation Therapy) for markerless patients using SGPS(Surface-Guided Patient Setup)
Lee Kyeong-Jae

Lee Eung-Man
Lee Jeong-Su
Kim Da-Yeon
Ko Hyeon-Jun
Choi Shin-Cheol
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the usefulness of Surface-Guided Patient Setup by comparing the patient positioning accuracy when image-guided radiation therapy was used for Markerless patients(unmarked on the skin) using Surface-Guided Patient Setup and Marker patients(marked on the skin) using Laser-Based Patient Setup.

Materials And Methods: The position error during IGRT was compared between a Markerless patient initially set up with SGPS using an optical surface scanning system using three cameras and a Marker patient initially set up with LBPS that aligns the laser with the marker drawn on the patient's skin. Both SGPS and LBPS were performed on 20 prostate cancer patients and 10 Stereotactic Radiation Surgery patients, respectively, and SGPS was performed on an additional 60 breast cancer patients. All were performed IGRT using CBCT or OBI. Position error of 6 degrees of freedom was obtained using Auto-Matching System, and comparison and analysis were performed using Offline-Review in the treatment planning system.

Result: The difference between the root mean square (RMS) of SGPS and LBPS in prostate cancer patients was Vrt -0.02cm, Log -0.02cm, Lat 0.01cm, Pit -0.01¡Æ, Rol -0.01¡Æ, Rtn -0.01¡Æ, SRS patients was Vrt 0.02cm, Log -0.05cm, Lat 0.00cm, Pit -0.30¡Æ, Rol -0.15¡Æ, Rtn -0.33¡Æ. there was no significant difference between the two regions. According to the IGRT standard of breast cancer patients, RMS was Vrt 0.26, Log 0.21, Lat 0.15, Pit 0.81, Rol 0.49, Rtn 0.59.

Conclusion:. As a result of this study, the position error value of SGPS compared to LBPS did not show a significant difference between prostate cancer patients and SRS patients. In the case of additionally performed SGPS breast cancer patients, the position error value was not large based on IGRT. Therefore, it is considered that it will be useful to replace LBPS with SGPS, which has the great advantage of not requiring patient skin marking.
KEYWORD
Surface-Guided Patient Setup, Markerless, Laser-Based Patient Setup, IGRT
FullTexts / Linksout information
 
Listed journal information